| CMC Markets | Comparison | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Information | ||
| 1989 | Founded | 1978 |
| United Kingdom | Country | United States |
| FCA, ASIC, MAS, BaFin, FSCA | Regulatory License | FCA, ASIC, SFC, MAS, FSCA, CBUAE |
| Compliant | Regulatory Status | Compliant |
| Trading Conditions | ||
| $0 | Min Deposit | $0 |
| 1:30 (retail) | Max Leverage | 1:50 |
| 0.7 | EUR/USD Spread | 0.2 |
| Execution Type | DMA | |
| MT4, Next Generation | Trading Platform | Trader Workstation (TWS), Web Trader, IBKR Mobile, API |
| Standard, Professional | Account Types | Individual, Joint, Corporate, IRA |
| Deposits & Withdrawals | ||
| Deposit Speed | 1-2 business days | |
| 1-2 business days | Withdrawal Speed | 1-3 business days |
| Free | Fees | Free |
| Services | ||
| Forex、CFD、Shares、Indices、Commodities、Cryptocurrencies、ETFs、Treasuries | Instruments | Forex、CFD、Shares、Options、Futures、Bonds、ETFs、Mutual Funds、Commodities、Indices |
| Score Comparison | ||
| 9.3 | Regulatory Qualification | 9.5 |
| 9.1 | Trading Environment | 8.5 |
| 9.2 | Deposit/Withdrawal Efficiency | 9.2 |
| 9.2 | User Reputation | 9.5 |
| 9 | Platform Features | 9.3 |
| 8.7 | Customer Service | 8 |
Editor Verdict: CMC Markets vs Interactive Brokers
The competition between CMC Markets and Interactive Brokers is exceptionally tight.
Six-dimension breakdown: CMC Markets wins 2, Interactive Brokers wins 3, with 1 ties.
CMC Markets provides better customer service responsiveness Trading conditions favor CMC Markets with more competitive spreads and leverage From a security standpoint, Interactive Brokers has more robust risk management.
Both brokers maintain high safety standards; choose based on your trading preferences.
* The above analysis reflects editorial opinion based on July 2026 objective data. Please assess risks independently.