| IC Markets | Comparison | XTB |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Information | ||
| 2007 | Founded | 2002 |
| Australia | Country | Poland |
| ASIC, CySEC, FSA(Seychelles), VFSC, FSC(Mauritius) | Regulatory License | FCA, CySEC, BaFin, DFSA, FSCA, IFSC |
| Compliant | Regulatory Status | Compliant |
| Trading Conditions | ||
| $200 | Min Deposit | $0 |
| 1:2000 | Max Leverage | 1:30 (retail) |
| 0.0 (Raw account) | EUR/USD Spread | 0.1 |
| ECN/STP | Execution Type | Market Maker |
| MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Trading Platform | xStation 5, MT4 |
| Standard, Raw Spread, cTrader Raw | Account Types | Standard, Pro |
| Deposits & Withdrawals | ||
| Instant | Deposit Speed | Instant |
| 1-2 business days | Withdrawal Speed | 1-2 business days |
| Free | Fees | Free |
| Services | ||
| Forex、CFD、Indices、Commodities、Cryptocurrencies、Bonds、Futures、Shares | Instruments | Forex、CFD、Shares、Indices、Commodities、Cryptocurrencies、ETFs |
| Score Comparison | ||
| 8.8 | Regulatory Qualification | 9 |
| 9.2 | Trading Environment | 8.8 |
| 8.9 | Deposit/Withdrawal Efficiency | 8.8 |
| 8.5 | User Reputation | 9 |
| 8.8 | Platform Features | 8.5 |
| 8.5 | Customer Service | 8.5 |
Editor Verdict: IC Markets vs XTB
IC Markets and XTB are closely matched with nearly identical scores.
Six-dimension breakdown: IC Markets wins 3, XTB wins 2, with 1 ties.
From a security standpoint, XTB has more robust risk management Trading conditions favor IC Markets with more competitive spreads and leverage IC Markets delivers a superior trading platform experience.
Both brokers maintain high safety standards; choose based on your trading preferences.
* The above comparison data is based on July 2026 FXBrokerTrust editorial testing, for reference only, and does not constitute investment advice. Forex trading involves significant risk.